Difference between revisions of "Anarchy 44/An anarchist in Africa"

From Anarchy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Ivanhoe
imported>Ivanhoe
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 24: Line 24:
 
{{tab}}Sedg&shy;wick<!-- 'Sedgewick' in original -->, as can be seen, was a rather senti&shy;mental Chris&shy;tian and his at&shy;ti&shy;tude was a trifle ex&shy;alted but when Living&shy;stone{{s}} {{qq|{{l|Lec&shy;tures|https://archive.org/details/cambridgelecture00liviuoft/page/n5}}}} were pub&shy;lished and Sedg&shy;wick<!-- 'Sedgewick' in original --> wrote the {{l|pre&shy;face|https://archive.org/details/cambridgelecture00liviuoft/page/n47}} the auth&shy;ors of his bio&shy;graphy write that {{qq|prob&shy;ably no&shy;thing con&shy;trib&shy;uted more di&shy;rectly to the estab&shy;lish&shy;ment of the {{w|Uni&shy;vers&shy;it&shy;ies Mis&shy;sion to Cen&shy;tral Africa|Universities'_Mission_to_Central_Africa}} than this short essay.}}
 
{{tab}}Sedg&shy;wick<!-- 'Sedgewick' in original -->, as can be seen, was a rather senti&shy;mental Chris&shy;tian and his at&shy;ti&shy;tude was a trifle ex&shy;alted but when Living&shy;stone{{s}} {{qq|{{l|Lec&shy;tures|https://archive.org/details/cambridgelecture00liviuoft/page/n5}}}} were pub&shy;lished and Sedg&shy;wick<!-- 'Sedgewick' in original --> wrote the {{l|pre&shy;face|https://archive.org/details/cambridgelecture00liviuoft/page/n47}} the auth&shy;ors of his bio&shy;graphy write that {{qq|prob&shy;ably no&shy;thing con&shy;trib&shy;uted more di&shy;rectly to the estab&shy;lish&shy;ment of the {{w|Uni&shy;vers&shy;it&shy;ies Mis&shy;sion to Cen&shy;tral Africa|Universities'_Mission_to_Central_Africa}} than this short essay.}}
  
{{tab}}Writ&shy;ing of the Living&shy;ston&shy;ian trad&shy;i&shy;tion in {{w|Cen&shy;tral Africa|Federation_of_Rhodesia_and_Nyasaland}} {{l|Patrick Keat&shy;ley|https://www.theguardian.com/media/2005/may/12/broadcasting.pressandpublishing}}<ref><font size="2">{{l|''The Polit&shy;ics of Part&shy;ner&shy;ship''|https://www.worldcat.org/title/politics-of-partnership/oclc/1377713}} by {{l|{{popup|Patrick Keat&shy;ley|Patrick Crawford Keatley, British journalist (1920‒2005)}}|https://www.theguardian.com/media/2005/may/12/broadcasting.pressandpublishing}} (Pelican).</font></ref> men&shy;tions the two {{w|em&shy;pire build&shy;ers|Empire-building}} of {{w|Rhod&shy;esia|Rhodesia}}, {{w|Cecil Rhodes|Cecil_Rhodes}} who {{qq|built with money and mil&shy;it&shy;ary power}} and David Living&shy;stone who {{qq|built his empire in the abid&shy;ing al&shy;le&shy;gian&shy;ces of men.}} Keat&shy;ley quotes an old Afri&shy;can friend of Living&shy;stone{{s}} who wrote of Living&shy;stone {{p|316}}as a person who {{qq|treated black men as brothers}} and whose {{qq|words were al&shy;ways gentle and man&shy;ners kind, and who knew the way to the hearts of men.}}
+
{{tab}}Writ&shy;ing of the Living&shy;ston&shy;ian trad&shy;i&shy;tion in {{w|Cen&shy;tral Africa|Federation_of_Rhodesia_and_Nyasaland}} {{l|Patrick Keat&shy;ley|https://www.theguardian.com/media/2005/may/12/broadcasting.pressandpublishing}}<ref><font size="2">{{l|''The Polit&shy;ics of Part&shy;ner&shy;ship''|https://www.worldcat.org/title/politics-of-partnership/oclc/1377713}} by {{l|{{popup|Patrick Keat&shy;ley|Patrick Crawford Keatley, British journalist (1920‒2005)}}|https://www.theguardian.com/media/2005/may/12/broadcasting.pressandpublishing}} (Pelican).</font></ref> men&shy;tions the two {{w|em&shy;pire build&shy;ers|Empire-building}} of {{w|Rhod&shy;esia|Rhodesia_(region)}}, {{w|Cecil Rhodes|Cecil_Rhodes}} who {{qq|built with money and mil&shy;it&shy;ary power}} and David Living&shy;stone who {{qq|built his empire in the abid&shy;ing al&shy;le&shy;gian&shy;ces of men.}} Keat&shy;ley quotes an old Afri&shy;can friend of Living&shy;stone{{s}} who wrote of Living&shy;stone {{p|316}}as a person who {{qq|treated black men as brothers}} and whose {{qq|words were al&shy;ways gentle and man&shy;ners kind, and who knew the way to the hearts of all men.}}
 +
 
 +
{{tab}}For my&shy;self I feel it legit&shy;im&shy;ate to claim that to teach in an Afri&shy;can run school in {{w|Salis&shy;bury|Harare}}, {{w|South&shy;ern Rhod&shy;esia|Southern_Rhodesia}} for close on a year at half wages is evid&shy;ence of a de&shy;sire to help the Afri&shy;can people. I have worked out that the amount of money due but not paid to me by {{w|High&shy;field Com&shy;mun&shy;ity School|Highfield,_Harare#Education}} is rather more than the con&shy;trib&shy;u&shy;tion made to the school by the {{w|Brit&shy;ish South Africa Com&shy;pany|British_South_Africa_Company}} over the same year.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
''The School''
 +
 
 +
 
 +
{{tab}}In his de&shy;scrip&shy;tion of the birth of High&shy;field Com&shy;mun&shy;ity School<ref><font size="2">''The Story of High&shy;field Com&shy;mun&shy;ity School'' by {{w|J. M. Chin&shy;amano|Josiah_Mushore_Chinamano}}.</font></ref>, Mr. {{w|Chin&shy;amano|Josiah_Mushore_Chinamano}} the Prin&shy;cipal of the School paints the back&shy;ground to the story by men&shy;tion&shy;ing the lodger sys&shy;tem which oper&shy;ates in the {{w|High&shy;field|Highfield,_Harare}} {{w|Afri&shy;can Town&shy;ship|Township_(South_Africa)}} of Salis&shy;bury. These lodgers were al&shy;lowed in High&shy;field so that the owners of the houses would be better able to pay off in&shy;stal&shy;ments on their houses. But {{qq|be&shy;cause, ac&shy;cord&shy;ing to law, chil&shy;dren of lodgers may not enter gov&shy;ern&shy;ment schools, this year (1962) more than 1,500 chil&shy;dren found them&shy;selves with&shy;out school&shy;ing.}}
 +
 
 +
{{tab}}Mr. Chin&shy;amano goes on to de&shy;scribe the demon&shy;stra&shy;tions that the chil&shy;dren made for schools. {{qq|Gov&shy;ern&shy;ment}} he wryly re&shy;marks {{qq|de&shy;cided to stick to the legal aspect and dis&shy;persed the chil&shy;dren with {{w|tear-<wbr>gas|Tear_gas}}. De&shy;ter&shy;mined to get school, these young&shy;sters de&shy;cided to {{q|In&shy;vade}} class&shy;rooms de&shy;mand&shy;ing to be taught. And again gov&shy;ern&shy;ment turned deaf ears to the de&shy;mands of the chil&shy;dren and in&shy;stead charged them with tres&shy;pass.}} Even&shy;tu&shy;ally the com&shy;mun&shy;ity of High&shy;field formed an as&shy;so&shy;ci&shy;a&shy;tion to pro&shy;vide school&shy;ing for the chil&shy;dren.
 +
 
 +
{{tab}}{{qq|By means of this self-<wbr>help ef&shy;fort}}, Mr. Chin&shy;amano con&shy;tinues, {{qq|Afri&shy;cans were able in a matter of a week, to raise about &pound;3,000 as school fees.}} The Gov&shy;ern&shy;ment toler&shy;ated the estab&shy;lish&shy;ment of the school but did not sup&shy;port it and a fund-<wbr>rais&shy;ing cam&shy;paign was started. Enough money was raised and church halls and old shops were lent or given to the school, 32 teach&shy;ers were em&shy;ployed and 1,300 chil&shy;dren pro&shy;vided with school.
 +
 
 +
{{tab}}An inter&shy;est&shy;ing com&shy;ment is made by the School Prin&shy;cipal in his re&shy;port when he writes: {{qq|The High&shy;field Com&shy;mun&shy;ity School As&shy;so&shy;ci&shy;a&shy;tion is con&shy;vinced that the answer to this edu&shy;ca&shy;tional crisis lies in the hands of the people and not of the Gov&shy;ern&shy;ment. As a re&shy;sult of the High&shy;field scheme vari&shy;ous centres in the coun&shy;try are estab&shy;lish&shy;ing sim&shy;ilar lo&shy;cally sup&shy;ported schools.}}
 +
 
 +
{{tab}}In Septem&shy;ber 1963 I left Britain to teach at the High&shy;field Com&shy;mun&shy;ity School. A re&shy;turn to Living&shy;stonia was evid&shy;ent in the fact that a trustee of the school, Sir {{w|Robert Tred&shy;gold|Robert_Clarkson_Tredgold}} is re&shy;lated to Living&shy;stone. It was not my first visit to Rhod&shy;esia, those inter&shy;ested in my earlier ex&shy;peri&shy;ences with the {{w|North&shy;ern Rhod&shy;esia|Northern_Rhodesia}} Gov&shy;ern&shy;ment can find them re&shy;lated in the {{qq|Uni&shy;vers&shy;ity Liber&shy;tarian}} No. 11.
 +
 
 +
{{p|317}}{{tab}}Before I was able to enter Rhod&shy;esia the body which was sponsor&shy;ing my jour&shy;ney, the {{w|Scot&shy;tish Union of Stu&shy;dents|National_Union_of_Students_Scotland}}, re&shy;ceived a cable at&shy;tempt&shy;ing to stop them send&shy;ing me. It was claimed, I am in&shy;formed, that I was a Com&shy;mun&shy;ist. Obvi&shy;ously the {{w|Brit&shy;ish secret police|Central_Intelligence_Organisation}} and the Rhod&shy;esian Gov&shy;ern&shy;ment work hand in hand and dis&shy;tort the facts in the pro&shy;cess. How&shy;ever by the time a final cable for&shy;bid&shy;ding me to go to Rhod&shy;esia had ar&shy;rived in Britain I was in the air being trans&shy;ported, iron&shy;ic&shy;ally enough, by the {{w|South Afri&shy;can Air&shy;ways|South_African_Airways}}, armed with a work permit issued in some bur&shy;eau&shy;cratic error.
 +
 
 +
{{tab}}Whilst I was teach&shy;ing at the school the num&shy;ber of chil&shy;dren there rose to 1,800 and the num&shy;ber of teach&shy;ers in&shy;creased. From month to month the school just man&shy;aged to pay sal&shy;aries and even the Gov&shy;ern&shy;ment pointed out in an article about the school {{qq|As a so&shy;cial ser&shy;vice it has an un&shy;doubted value, re&shy;cog&shy;nised by the police in keep&shy;ing poten&shy;tial juv&shy;en&shy;ile de&shy;lin&shy;quents oc&shy;cu&shy;pied through&shy;out a full work&shy;ing day.}} The school was also im&shy;port&shy;ant to {{w|Afri&shy;can na&shy;tion&shy;al&shy;ists|African_nationalism}} as a demon&shy;stra&shy;tion of their cre&shy;at&shy;ive&shy;ness and prac&shy;tic&shy;al&shy;ity.
 +
 
 +
{{tab}}Con&shy;di&shy;tions at the school were poor. Classes were over 50 in num&shy;ber, text books were scarce, class&shy;rooms be&shy;came very stuffy and hot in the warm weather, the load for teach&shy;ers was very heavy. Yet through all this a cheer&shy;ful school emerged. A memor&shy;able Christ&shy;mas carol con&shy;cert was given by the school to the com&shy;mun&shy;ity and Afri&shy;can songs be&shy;came part of the con&shy;cert.
 +
 
 +
{{tab}}Many is the time at the end of an ex&shy;haust&shy;ing day when one could hear three or four chil&shy;dren sing&shy;ing to&shy;gether in a class&shy;room demon&shy;strat&shy;ing the Afri&shy;can{{s|r}} great love of song. I taught His&shy;tory, Eng&shy;lish and Bio&shy;logy mainly th the class pre&shy;par&shy;ing for {{w|{{q|O}} level|GCE_Ordinary_Level}} and the in&shy;tens&shy;ity of their polit&shy;ical views over-<wbr>reached it&shy;self in the his&shy;tory classes, whilst in Bio&shy;logy total lack of equip&shy;ment meant ex&shy;peri&shy;ments were im&shy;pos&shy;sible.
 +
 
 +
{{tab}}Trouble for the school started earlier this year when the Prin&shy;cipal of the School Mr. Chin&shy;amano was ar&shy;rested with {{w|Joshua Nkomo|Joshua_Nkomo}} and re&shy;stric&shy;ted to a re&shy;mote area of South&shy;ern Rhod&shy;esia. It seemed to all of us that the Gov&shy;ern&shy;ment was set on de&shy;stroy&shy;ing the school and we heard ru&shy;mours of plans to close it down. Some&shy;how we man&shy;aged to strug&shy;gle on but in re&shy;cent months an un&shy;happy series of events has brought the school to its knees.
 +
 
 +
{{tab}}I can quote from an article I wrote for the Afri&shy;can {{w|Daily News|Daily_News_(Durban)}}<ref><font size="2">{{qq|Why I Re&shy;signed from Com&shy;mun&shy;ity School}} by [[Author:Jeremy Westall|Jeremy Westall]] ({{w|''Daily News''|Daily_News_(Durban)}} 29/7/64).</font></ref> shortly be&shy;fore I left Rhod&shy;esia which ex&shy;plains the posi&shy;tion. {{qq|We have had a very hard time re&shy;cently at the school. Some&shy;body has organ&shy;ised a dis&shy;rupt&shy;ive ele&shy;ment both in&shy;side and out&shy;side the school|l}}
 +
 
 +
{{tab}}{{qq|These thugs have made teach&shy;ing dif&shy;fi&shy;cult. They have broken down the de&shy;sire to learn and they have in&shy;tim&shy;i&shy;dated the chil&shy;dren into de&shy;mand&shy;ing that all teach&shy;ers with af&shy;fili&shy;a&shy;tions to the {{w|Zim&shy;babwe Afri&shy;can Na&shy;tional Union|Zimbabwe_African_National_Union}} should be boy&shy;cot&shy;ted.|l}}
 +
 
 +
{{tab}}{{qq|Three of the long&shy;est serv&shy;ing and most loyal mem&shy;bers of staff were at&shy;tacked or boy&shy;cot&shy;ted by the chil&shy;dren at the school. It was a de&shy;plor&shy;able ex&shy;hib&shy;i&shy;tion of chil&shy;dren being used for polit&shy;ical mot&shy;ives.|l}}
 +
 
 +
{{tab}}{{qq|Indeed Mr. Chin&shy;amano in his letter to me wrote: {{q|I was sorry to hear that Mr. Mafu&shy;kidze was sub&shy;jected to un&shy;healthy treat&shy;ment<!-- 'treathment' in original --> by the stu&shy;dents.}}<!-- double quotation marks in original -->|l}}
 +
 
 +
{{tab}}{{qq|He wrote this be&shy;cause he knows it is fatal if polit&shy;ics, rather than edu&shy;ca&shy;tion, is the main con&shy;sider&shy;a&shy;tion at the school.|l}}
 +
 
 +
{{tab}}{{qq|Never&shy;the&shy;less, when the teach&shy;ers had been boy&shy;cot&shy;ted I was shocked to dis&shy;cover shortly after&shy;wards that the teach&shy;ers in ques&shy;tion has been re&shy;placed. They had not re&shy;signed, they had not been dis&shy;missed but they had been re&shy;placed.|l}}
 +
 
 +
{{tab}}{{qq|I was dis&shy;mayed that the com&shy;mit&shy;tee of the school could allow them&shy;selves to be in&shy;tim&shy;i&shy;dated into treat&shy;ing these teach&shy;ers so un&shy;justly.|l}}
 +
 
 +
{{tab}}{{qq|It was after this that I de&shy;cided to re&shy;sign in the hope that it would be real&shy;ised the in&shy;just treat&shy;ment of the teach&shy;ers was not con&shy;doned by this par&shy;tic&shy;u&shy;lar mem&shy;ber of staff.|l}}
 +
 
 +
{{tab}}{{qq|I would em&shy;phas&shy;ise that my action has no polit&shy;ical mot&shy;ive. It is action over the prin&shy;ciple of a per&shy;son being vic&shy;tim&shy;ised for his opin&shy;ions.|l}}
 +
 
 +
{{tab}}{{qq|If the tables were turned and a {{popup|PCC|People's Caretaker Council (1963‒1964), an African nationalist organisation led by Joshua Nkomo}} teacher was vic&shy;tim&shy;ised for his opin&shy;ions I would take sim&shy;ilar action.|l}}
 +
 
 +
{{tab}}{{qq|I be&shy;lieve, very strongly, that edu&shy;ca&shy;tion domin&shy;ated by polit&shy;ics be&shy;comes in&shy;doc&shy;trin&shy;a&shy;tion and that this worth&shy;less sub&shy;sti&shy;tute for the real thing is a mark of total&shy;it&shy;arian&shy;ism. For a polit&shy;ical move&shy;ment to have con&shy;trol of chil&shy;dren{{s|r}} minds is fatal{{dash}}no free&shy;dom can flour&shy;ish in such an atmo&shy;sphere. An at&shy;ti&shy;tude of slav&shy;ish obe&shy;di&shy;ence is driven into the mal&shy;le&shy;able minds of the chil&shy;dren so that they can&shy;not think for them&shy;selves.|l}}
 +
 
 +
{{tab}}{{qq|All I can do is ask you, for your own sakes to build a sense of toler&shy;a&shy;tion of other people{{s}} views. Do not follow the ex&shy;ample of {{w|Ian Smith|Ian_Smith}} and call those who dis&shy;agree with you en&shy;emies of the people. Do not re&shy;peat the worst mis&shy;takes of Euro&shy;pean his&shy;tory where dic&shy;tat&shy;ors have sought to wipe out the flower of free&shy;dom.}}
 +
 
 +
{{tab}}That I was ad&shy;vised to leave Rhod&shy;esia at the earli&shy;est op&shy;por&shy;tun&shy;ity after the pub&shy;lica&shy;tion of this article shows that it had some ef&shy;fect at least.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
''African Na&shy;tion&shy;al&shy;ism''
 +
 
 +
 
 +
{{tab}}Writ&shy;ing in [[Anarchy 3|{{sc|anarchy}} No. 3]] on {{qq|[[Anarchy 3/Africa and the future|Africa and the Future]]}} in May 1961 I wrote: {{qq|What&shy;ever one says or thinks of the Afri&shy;can na&shy;tion&shy;al&shy;ist polit&shy;i&shy;cians, it is good to see a people throw&shy;ing off the yoke of colon&shy;ial&shy;ism. To me the thought of one na&shy;tion for&shy;cing its cus&shy;toms and cul&shy;ture on to an&shy;other is so des&shy;pic&shy;able that I re&shy;joice in the fact that the Afri&shy;cans want to make their own way. This is what gains my qual&shy;if&shy;ied sup&shy;port for the vari&shy;ous strug&shy;gles for in&shy;de&shy;pend&shy;ence. What I do em&shy;phas&shy;ise how&shy;ever, is that the strug&shy;gle is ''only'' for in&shy;de&shy;pend&shy;ence and is, sadly, no&shy;thing to do with free&shy;dom.}} My re&shy;cent ex&shy;peri&shy;ences of Afri&shy;can na&shy;tion&shy;al&shy;ism as re&shy;lated above con&shy;firm, to my mind, this ap&shy;proach. A time has come to get the matter of Afri&shy;can na&shy;tion&shy;al&shy;ism in its true per&shy;spec&shy;tive. It is in fact a con&shy;cept which is dan&shy;ger&shy;ous to those ideals which anar&shy;chists hold dear. I have lost all pa&shy;tience with pacif&shy;ists who sup&shy;port the {{qq|non-<wbr>violent}} {{w|Kenneth Kaunda|Kenneth_Kaunda}} and greet the slaugh&shy;ter of 300 Afri&shy;cans by Kaunda{{s}} {{p|319}}Gov&shy;ern&shy;ment with si&shy;lence. No amount of double-<wbr>talk can just&shy;ify the per&shy;son who mouths words about fair play and turns a blind eye to the brutal and cruel treat&shy;ment meted out by Afri&shy;cans to other Afri&shy;cans who op&shy;pose them.
 +
 
 +
{{tab}}One reads a letter to the {{w|''Daily Tele&shy;graph''|The_Daily_Telegraph}}<ref><font size="2">{{qq|Lumpa Sect Crimes}} by {{w|Mainza Chona|Mainza_Chona}} ({{w|''Daily Tele&shy;graph''|The_Daily_Telegraph}} 13/8/64).</font></ref> by the Min&shy;ister of Just&shy;ice in North&shy;ern Rhod&shy;esia, {{w|Mainza Chona|Mainza_Chona}} with un&shy;ut&shy;ter&shy;able dis&shy;gust. Con&shy;cern&shy;ing the sup&shy;pres&shy;sion of the {{w|Lumpa sect|Lumpa_Church}} in North&shy;ern Rhod&shy;esia the Min&shy;ister of Just&shy;ice writes: {{qq|Your sym&shy;pathy for these sav&shy;ages is giv&shy;ing rise to sus&shy;pi&shy;cions that an im&shy;per&shy;ial&shy;ist may be a brain be&shy;hind {{w|Len&shy;shina|Alice_Lenshina}}.}} He con&shy;tin&shy;ues to com&shy;plain that {{qq|In {{w|Chin&shy;sali|Chinsali}} the Lumpa Church was not merely non-<wbr>polit&shy;ical; it was pos&shy;it&shy;ively anti-<wbr>polit&shy;ics. Its lead&shy;ers hurled the worst and most prim&shy;it&shy;ive abus&shy;ive curses at lead&shy;ing pol&shy;it&shy;i&shy;cians.}} For my&shy;self, hav&shy;ing seen at close quar&shy;ters the work&shy;ings of Afri&shy;can polit&shy;ics I would com&shy;mend whole&shy;heart&shy;edly the anti-<wbr>polit&shy;ical stand taken by the Lumpa Church.
 +
 
 +
{{tab}}Anar&shy;chism has been of re&shy;lev&shy;ance to a few Afri&shy;cans in the pres&shy;ent age. In the {{popup|war years|World War II, 1939–1945}} {{w|Jomo Ken&shy;yatta|Jomo_Kenyatta}} wrote for the anar&shy;chist press, but look at him now, a com&shy;mit&shy;ted {{w|cen&shy;tral&shy;ist|Kenya_African_National_Union#Ideology}}. The {{w|Foreign Min&shy;ister|Abdulrahman_Mohamed_Babu}} of {{w|Zan&shy;zi&shy;bar|People's_Republic_of_Zanzibar}} has claimed an in&shy;tel&shy;lec&shy;tual sym&shy;pathy with anar&shy;chism and Kaunda is friendly with the liber&shy;tarian {{w|John Pap&shy;worth|John_Papworth}}. Al&shy;though the whole di&shy;rec&shy;tion of events in Africa seems to be rush&shy;ing away from anar&shy;chism I am con&shy;fid&shy;ent that soon the short&shy;com&shy;ings of Afri&shy;can na&shy;tion&shy;al&shy;ism will be seen and les&shy;sons will be learnt.
 +
 
 +
{{tab}}The {{w|mutin&shy;ies in East Africa|Tanganyika_Rifles}} and the {{l|gen&shy;eral strike|https://www.marxists.org/archive/padmore/1945/labour-congress/ch10.htm}} in {{w|Nigeria|Colonial_Nigeria}} are point&shy;ers to the fact that the Afri&shy;can people are not con&shy;tent with black lead&shy;ers who line their own pock&shy;ets at the ex&shy;pense of the people. In my own ex&shy;peri&shy;ence I know the com&shy;munal ideas of anar&shy;chism are of in&shy;stinc&shy;tive inter&shy;est to Afri&shy;cans.
 +
 
 +
{{tab}}We may yet see the day when the end of {{w|white suprem&shy;acist rule|Settler_colonialism#In_Africa}} in {{w|South&shy;ern Africa|Southern_Africa}} coin&shy;cides with the Afri&shy;can people awaken&shy;ing to the ideas of anar&shy;chist com&shy;mun&shy;ism as they ap&shy;pre&shy;ci&shy;ate the simil&shy;ar&shy;it&shy;ies of the white settler rulers and the black rulers. One only needs to add that these twin events in Africa would in&shy;volve the {{w|Iber&shy;ian Pen&shy;insula|Iberian_Peninsula}} in a re&shy;sur&shy;gence of the {{w|anar&shy;cho-<wbr>syn&shy;dic&shy;al&shy;ist|Anarcho-syndicalism}} strug&shy;gle set off by the over&shy;throw of {{w|Sala&shy;zar|António_de_Oliveira_Salazar}}.
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 35: Line 101:
  
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Anarchist in africa}}
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Anarchist in africa}}
 +
[[Category:Children]]
 +
[[Category:Colonialism]]
 +
[[Category:Education]]
 +
[[Category:Government]]
 +
[[Category:Protest]]
 +
[[Category:Student movements]]
 
[[Category:Articles]]
 
[[Category:Articles]]

Latest revision as of 18:17, 1 January 2019


315

An anarchist
in Africa

JEREMY WESTALL


As an intro­duc­tion to this article it is my in­ten­tion to estab­lish that, through my an­ces­tors and my­self, I can claim to be a per­son who is inter­ested in help­ing Africa rather than ex­ploit­ing her. This is worth men­tion­ing be­cause many Euro­peans who have been as­so­ci­ated with Africa havee been greedy ex­ploit­ers, tak­ing rather than giv­ing, de­stroy­ing rather than build­ing.

  There is how­ever a trad­i­tion in Africa which speaks for Euro­pean rad­ic­als. It can be seen hist­or­ic­ally in the life-work of Living­stone; today men like <span data-html="true" class="plainlinks" title="Wikipedia: Guy Clutton-Brock">Guy Clutton-Brock and Terence Ranger fit into this trad­i­tion. In Africa “the lib­er­als” are re­nowned for cour­age and de­term­in­a­tion, they are a proud ex­ample of be­lief being trans­ferred into action; un­like the weak lib­er­al­ism of the Euro­pean coun­tries Africa’s lib­er­al­ism is tough and prac­tical. Its rad­ical tough­ness places it close to the anar­chist philo­sophy.

  I can claim some as­so­ci­a­tion with the Living­ston­ian trad­i­tion. My great-grand­mother was the sister of Adam Sedg­wick, a close friend of Living­stone’s. Adam Sedg­wick as a Fellow of Trin­ity Col­lege, Cam­bridge was in­flu­en­tial in as­sist­ing Living­stone. Of Living­stone Sedgwick wrote: “He stood before us a plain, single-minded, cheer­ful man and he ad­dressed us in un­adorned and simple words.” The auth­ors of Sedg­wick’s bio­graphy[1] re­port that when Sedg­wick spoke at a meet­ing in Cam­bridge after Living­stone “he en­treated his hear­ers not merely to wel­come and thank Living­stone for what he had said, but to carry for­ward the noble work which he had so auspi­ciously begun. His words were few, but well chosen, and when he sat down the ap­plause told that they had gone straight to the hearts of his hear­ers.”

  Sedg­wick, as can be seen, was a rather senti­mental Chris­tian and his at­ti­tude was a trifle ex­alted but when Living­stone’s “Lec­tures” were pub­lished and Sedg­wick wrote the pre­face the auth­ors of his bio­graphy write that “prob­ably no­thing con­trib­uted more di­rectly to the estab­lish­ment of the Uni­vers­it­ies Mis­sion to Cen­tral Africa than this short essay.”

  Writ­ing of the Living­ston­ian trad­i­tion in Cen­tral Africa Patrick Keat­ley[2] men­tions the two em­pire build­ers of Rhod­esia, Cecil Rhodes who “built with money and mil­it­ary power” and David Living­stone who “built his empire in the abid­ing al­le­gian­ces of men.” Keat­ley quotes an old Afri­can friend of Living­stone’s who wrote of Living­stone
316
as a person who “treated black men as brothers” and whose “words were al­ways gentle and man­ners kind, and who knew the way to the hearts of all men.”

  For my­self I feel it legit­im­ate to claim that to teach in an Afri­can run school in Salis­bury, South­ern Rhod­esia for close on a year at half wages is evid­ence of a de­sire to help the Afri­can people. I have worked out that the amount of money due but not paid to me by High­field Com­mun­ity School is rather more than the con­trib­u­tion made to the school by the Brit­ish South Africa Com­pany over the same year.


The School


  In his de­scrip­tion of the birth of High­field Com­mun­ity School[3], Mr. Chin­amano the Prin­cipal of the School paints the back­ground to the story by men­tion­ing the lodger sys­tem which oper­ates in the High­field Afri­can Town­ship of Salis­bury. These lodgers were al­lowed in High­field so that the owners of the houses would be better able to pay off in­stal­ments on their houses. But “be­cause, ac­cord­ing to law, chil­dren of lodgers may not enter gov­ern­ment schools, this year (1962) more than 1,500 chil­dren found them­selves with­out school­ing.”

  Mr. Chin­amano goes on to de­scribe the demon­stra­tions that the chil­dren made for schools. “Gov­ern­ment” he wryly re­marks “de­cided to stick to the legal aspect and dis­persed the chil­dren with <span data-html="true" class="plainlinks" title="Wikipedia: tear-gas">tear-gas. De­ter­mined to get school, these young­sters de­cided to ‘In­vade’ class­rooms de­mand­ing to be taught. And again gov­ern­ment turned deaf ears to the de­mands of the chil­dren and in­stead charged them with tres­pass.” Even­tu­ally the com­mun­ity of High­field formed an as­so­ci­a­tion to pro­vide school­ing for the chil­dren.

  “By means of this self-help ef­fort”, Mr. Chin­amano con­tinues, “Afri­cans were able in a matter of a week, to raise about £3,000 as school fees.” The Gov­ern­ment toler­ated the estab­lish­ment of the school but did not sup­port it and a fund-rais­ing cam­paign was started. Enough money was raised and church halls and old shops were lent or given to the school, 32 teach­ers were em­ployed and 1,300 chil­dren pro­vided with school.

  An inter­est­ing com­ment is made by the School Prin­cipal in his re­port when he writes: “The High­field Com­mun­ity School As­so­ci­a­tion is con­vinced that the answer to this edu­ca­tional crisis lies in the hands of the people and not of the Gov­ern­ment. As a re­sult of the High­field scheme vari­ous centres in the coun­try are estab­lish­ing sim­ilar lo­cally sup­ported schools.”

  In Septem­ber 1963 I left Britain to teach at the High­field Com­mun­ity School. A re­turn to Living­stonia was evid­ent in the fact that a trustee of the school, Sir Robert Tred­gold is re­lated to Living­stone. It was not my first visit to Rhod­esia, those inter­ested in my earlier ex­peri­ences with the North­ern Rhod­esia Gov­ern­ment can find them re­lated in the “Uni­vers­ity Liber­tarian” No. 11.

317
  Before I was able to enter Rhod­esia the body which was sponsor­ing my jour­ney, the Scot­tish Union of Stu­dents, re­ceived a cable at­tempt­ing to stop them send­ing me. It was claimed, I am in­formed, that I was a Com­mun­ist. Obvi­ously the Brit­ish secret police and the Rhod­esian Gov­ern­ment work hand in hand and dis­tort the facts in the pro­cess. How­ever by the time a final cable for­bid­ding me to go to Rhod­esia had ar­rived in Britain I was in the air being trans­ported, iron­ic­ally enough, by the South Afri­can Air­ways, armed with a work permit issued in some bur­eau­cratic error.

  Whilst I was teach­ing at the school the num­ber of chil­dren there rose to 1,800 and the num­ber of teach­ers in­creased. From month to month the school just man­aged to pay sal­aries and even the Gov­ern­ment pointed out in an article about the school “As a so­cial ser­vice it has an un­doubted value, re­cog­nised by the police in keep­ing poten­tial juv­en­ile de­lin­quents oc­cu­pied through­out a full work­ing day.” The school was also im­port­ant to Afri­can na­tion­al­ists as a demon­stra­tion of their cre­at­ive­ness and prac­tic­al­ity.

  Con­di­tions at the school were poor. Classes were over 50 in num­ber, text books were scarce, class­rooms be­came very stuffy and hot in the warm weather, the load for teach­ers was very heavy. Yet through all this a cheer­ful school emerged. A memor­able Christ­mas carol con­cert was given by the school to the com­mun­ity and Afri­can songs be­came part of the con­cert.

  Many is the time at the end of an ex­haust­ing day when one could hear three or four chil­dren sing­ing to­gether in a class­room demon­strat­ing the Afri­cans’ great love of song. I taught His­tory, Eng­lish and Bio­logy mainly th the class pre­par­ing for ‘O’ level and the in­tens­ity of their polit­ical views over-reached it­self in the his­tory classes, whilst in Bio­logy total lack of equip­ment meant ex­peri­ments were im­pos­sible.

  Trouble for the school started earlier this year when the Prin­cipal of the School Mr. Chin­amano was ar­rested with Joshua Nkomo and re­stric­ted to a re­mote area of South­ern Rhod­esia. It seemed to all of us that the Gov­ern­ment was set on de­stroy­ing the school and we heard ru­mours of plans to close it down. Some­how we man­aged to strug­gle on but in re­cent months an un­happy series of events has brought the school to its knees.

  I can quote from an article I wrote for the Afri­can Daily News[4] shortly be­fore I left Rhod­esia which ex­plains the posi­tion. “We have had a very hard time re­cently at the school. Some­body has organ­ised a dis­rupt­ive ele­ment both in­side and out­side the school

  “These thugs have made teach­ing dif­fi­cult. They have broken down the de­sire to learn and they have in­tim­i­dated the chil­dren into de­mand­ing that all teach­ers with af­fili­a­tions to the Zim­babwe Afri­can Na­tional Union should be boy­cot­ted.

  “Three of the long­est serv­ing and most loyal mem­bers of staff were at­tacked or boy­cot­ted by the chil­dren at the school. It was a de­plor­able ex­hib­i­tion of chil­dren being used for polit­ical mot­ives.

  “Indeed Mr. Chin­amano in his letter to me wrote: ‘I was sorry to hear that Mr. Mafu­kidze was sub­jected to un­healthy treat­ment by the stu­dents.’

  “He wrote this be­cause he knows it is fatal if polit­ics, rather than edu­ca­tion, is the main con­sider­a­tion at the school.

  “Never­the­less, when the teach­ers had been boy­cot­ted I was shocked to dis­cover shortly after­wards that the teach­ers in ques­tion has been re­placed. They had not re­signed, they had not been dis­missed but they had been re­placed.

  “I was dis­mayed that the com­mit­tee of the school could allow them­selves to be in­tim­i­dated into treat­ing these teach­ers so un­justly.

  “It was after this that I de­cided to re­sign in the hope that it would be real­ised the in­just treat­ment of the teach­ers was not con­doned by this par­tic­u­lar mem­ber of staff.

  “I would em­phas­ise that my action has no polit­ical mot­ive. It is action over the prin­ciple of a per­son being vic­tim­ised for his opin­ions.

  “If the tables were turned and a PCC teacher was vic­tim­ised for his opin­ions I would take sim­ilar action.

  “I be­lieve, very strongly, that edu­ca­tion domin­ated by polit­ics be­comes in­doc­trin­a­tion and that this worth­less sub­sti­tute for the real thing is a mark of total­it­arian­ism. For a polit­ical move­ment to have con­trol of chil­drens’ minds is fatal—no free­dom can flour­ish in such an atmo­sphere. An at­ti­tude of slav­ish obe­di­ence is driven into the mal­le­able minds of the chil­dren so that they can­not think for them­selves.

  “All I can do is ask you, for your own sakes to build a sense of toler­a­tion of other people’s views. Do not follow the ex­ample of Ian Smith and call those who dis­agree with you en­emies of the people. Do not re­peat the worst mis­takes of Euro­pean his­tory where dic­tat­ors have sought to wipe out the flower of free­dom.”

  That I was ad­vised to leave Rhod­esia at the earli­est op­por­tun­ity after the pub­lica­tion of this article shows that it had some ef­fect at least.


African Na­tion­al­ism


  Writ­ing in anarchy No. 3 on “Africa and the Future” in May 1961 I wrote: “What­ever one says or thinks of the Afri­can na­tion­al­ist polit­i­cians, it is good to see a people throw­ing off the yoke of colon­ial­ism. To me the thought of one na­tion for­cing its cus­toms and cul­ture on to an­other is so des­pic­able that I re­joice in the fact that the Afri­cans want to make their own way. This is what gains my qual­if­ied sup­port for the vari­ous strug­gles for in­de­pend­ence. What I do em­phas­ise how­ever, is that the strug­gle is only for in­de­pend­ence and is, sadly, no­thing to do with free­dom.” My re­cent ex­peri­ences of Afri­can na­tion­al­ism as re­lated above con­firm, to my mind, this ap­proach. A time has come to get the matter of Afri­can na­tion­al­ism in its true per­spec­tive. It is in fact a con­cept which is dan­ger­ous to those ideals which anar­chists hold dear. I have lost all pa­tience with pacif­ists who sup­port the “non-violent” Kenneth Kaunda and greet the slaugh­ter of 300 Afri­cans by Kaunda’s
319
Gov­ern­ment with si­lence. No amount of double-talk can just­ify the per­son who mouths words about fair play and turns a blind eye to the brutal and cruel treat­ment meted out by Afri­cans to other Afri­cans who op­pose them.

  One reads a letter to the Daily Tele­graph[5] by the Min­ister of Just­ice in North­ern Rhod­esia, Mainza Chona with un­ut­ter­able dis­gust. Con­cern­ing the sup­pres­sion of the Lumpa sect in North­ern Rhod­esia the Min­ister of Just­ice writes: “Your sym­pathy for these sav­ages is giv­ing rise to sus­pi­cions that an im­per­ial­ist may be a brain be­hind Len­shina.” He con­tin­ues to com­plain that “In Chin­sali the Lumpa Church was not merely non-polit­ical; it was pos­it­ively anti-polit­ics. Its lead­ers hurled the worst and most prim­it­ive abus­ive curses at lead­ing pol­it­i­cians.” For my­self, hav­ing seen at close quar­ters the work­ings of Afri­can polit­ics I would com­mend whole­heart­edly the anti-polit­ical stand taken by the Lumpa Church.

  Anar­chism has been of re­lev­ance to a few Afri­cans in the pres­ent age. In the war years Jomo Ken­yatta wrote for the anar­chist press, but look at him now, a com­mit­ted cen­tral­ist. The Foreign Min­ister of Zan­zi­bar has claimed an in­tel­lec­tual sym­pathy with anar­chism and Kaunda is friendly with the liber­tarian John Pap­worth. Al­though the whole di­rec­tion of events in Africa seems to be rush­ing away from anar­chism I am con­fid­ent that soon the short­com­ings of Afri­can na­tion­al­ism will be seen and les­sons will be learnt.

  The mutin­ies in East Africa and the gen­eral strike in Nigeria are point­ers to the fact that the Afri­can people are not con­tent with black lead­ers who line their own pock­ets at the ex­pense of the people. In my own ex­peri­ence I know the com­munal ideas of anar­chism are of in­stinc­tive inter­est to Afri­cans.

  We may yet see the day when the end of white suprem­acist rule in South­ern Africa coin­cides with the Afri­can people awaken­ing to the ideas of anar­chist com­mun­ism as they ap­pre­ci­ate the simil­ar­it­ies of the white settler rulers and the black rulers. One only needs to add that these twin events in Africa would in­volve the Iber­ian Pen­insula in a re­sur­gence of the <span data-html="true" class="plainlinks" title="Wikipedia: anar­cho-syn­dic­al­ist">anar­cho-syn­dic­al­ist strug­gle set off by the over­throw of Sala­zar.




  1. Life and Letters of Sedg­wick by Clark & Hughes. 2 Vols. (Cam­bridge Univ. Press).
  2. The Polit­ics of Part­ner­ship by Patrick Keat­ley (Pelican).
  3. The Story of High­field Com­mun­ity School by J. M. Chin­amano.
  4. “Why I Re­signed from Com­mun­ity School” by Jeremy Westall (Daily News 29/7/64).
  5. “Lumpa Sect Crimes” by Mainza Chona (Daily Tele­graph 13/8/64).