Anarchy 94/The instant new society - Revision history

imported>Ivanhoe at 22:41, 23 September 2016

2016-09-23T22:41:08Z

69.50.181.155 at 01:12, 13 September 2016

2016-09-13T01:12:00Z

69.50.181.155: Created page with "{{header | title = ANARCHY 94 (Vol 8 No 12) DECEMBER 1968
The instant new society | author = Paraic Marren | section = | previous = ../Daniel Gu..."

2016-09-13T01:10:08Z

Created page with "{{header | title = [[../|ANARCHY 94 (Vol 8 No 12) DECEMBER 1968]]<br>The instant new society | author = Paraic Marren | section = | previous = ../Daniel Gu..."

New page

{{header
| title = [[../|ANARCHY 94 (Vol 8 No 12) DECEMBER 1968]]<br>The instant new society
| author = Paraic Marren
| section =
| previous = [[../Daniel Guerin's anarchism|Daniel Guerin’s anarchism]]
| next = [[../Index to Anarchy Volume Eight|Index to Anarchy Volume Eight]]
| notes =
}}

<div style="max-width:500px; margin:auto;">

<font size="5">'''The instant new society'''</font>

<font size="4">'''[[Author:Paraic Marren|PARAIC MARREN]]'''</font>

{{j|'''THE STUDENT REVOLT by {{l|Herve Bourges|https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hervé_Bourges}} (Panther, 6s.).'''

'''FRENCH REVOLUTION 1968 by {{w|Patrick Seale|Patrick_Seale}} & Maureen McConville (Penguin, 6s.).'''

'''THE BEGINNING OF THE END by Angelo Quattrocchi & {{w|Tom Nairn|Tom_Nairn}} (Panther, 6s.).'''

{{sc|When reading the above three books}}, one can’t but feel that the {{w|material|May_1968_events_in_France}} has already been presented with a lot more clarity and a lot less verbiage in {{sc|anarchy}} [[Anarchy 89|89]] and [[Anarchy 90|90]] and the excellent ''Solidarity'' pamphlet number 30. Also, this {{qq|history-before-you-really-know-it’s-happened}} kind of book has the effect of consigning to the past a movement that is incomplete and the course of which is still undecided.

{{tab}}''The Student Revolt'' is a collection of interviews with various activists including [[Author:Daniel Cohn-Bendit|Cohn-Bendit]]. And, as such, they are conducted by a not particularly constructive interviewer who bounces from one poiint to the next without attempting to probe the depths of anything.

{{tab}}The superficiality is boring. Often the argument is about words, seldom about ideas. In most of his questions, and consequently, in most of the answers, Bourges fails to distinguish the political situation from the educational situation. Cohn-Bendit’s interview with {{w|Jean-Paul Sartre|Jean-Paul_Sartre}} is the best section but it is almost the only readable part of a book that is both confused and confusing. Next:

{{tab}}''French Revolution 1968''. Done in the style of the journalist writing up the latest phenomenon. It is the sort of book usually described as lucid, vivid, trenchant, brilliant. It is all of these, and as a detailed, impartial account of the events it succeeds. {{w|Seale|Patrick_Seale}} and McConville are among the best journalists around, and and their account is sharp, critical and pointed when dealing with the squirming of the authorities and the somersaults of the {{w|communist party|French_Communist_Party}}. However, they flounder irritatingly when dealing with the extreme left. They exaggerate the {{w|Trotskyist|Trotskyism}} and deprecate the anarchist influence. Daniel Cohn-Bendit appears as a sort of rebellious clown who played little more than an amusingly disruptive role and the book holds such gems of unexpurgated blah as {{qq|There could be no greater contrast between the disciplined, purposeful {{l|J.C.R.|https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeunesse_communiste_révolutionnaire}} (Trotskyist) cadres and the free-booting Cohn-Bendit}} and a quoted description of Cohn-Bendit as {{qq|''inorganise et inorganisable''}} (disorgnised and beyond organisation). Yet, it is a fair and readable effort. The dictionary has a word for it: Competent.

{{tab}}By far the best book of the three is ''The Beginning of the End''.

{{tab}}Poetry and Revolution; they are twins. The fever running through the prose-poetry of Quattrocchi in part one (What Happened) brings the future society and its idea closer than all the Marxist jargon and pseudo-dialectic dogma distilled by every {{w|CP|Communist_party}} and authoritarian socialist hack on earth. Through the pages of near-verse one does not so much read of the events as live them.

{{tab}}Although, like the others, it fails to supplement our knowledge of the events, it is yet invaluable as a rendering (Quattrocchi) and as an analysis (Nairn).

{{tab}}{{w|Tom Nairn|Tom_Nairn}} is the author of the second part (Why It Happened).

{{tab}}He writes of {{qq|the resurrection of anarchist thought and feeling in May, the host of black flags which sprang up from nowhere alongside the red ones. The anarchist {{q|groupuscules}}, feeble organisationally and small in numbers, were nevertheless far closer than the Marxist sects to the spirit of what was happening.}}

{{tab}}These two writers understand that there is only one kind of freedom: total freedom. And that it cannot exist within the framework of somebody’s state, not though his name be {{w|Dubcek|Alexander_Dubček}} nor {{w|Johnson|Lyndon_Baines_Johnson}} nor {{w|Castro|Fidel_Castro}} nor {{w|de Gaulle|Charles_de_Gaulle}}. Again Nairn writes {{qq|All the evidence of May suggests strongly that without a powerful dose of anarchic sentiments and ideas, a revolution of this sort and in these conditions is very unlikely to get far}}.

{{tab}}The authors conclude: {{qq|The anarchism of 1871 looked backwards to a pre-capitalist past, doomed to defeat; the anarchism of 1968 looks forward to the future society almost within our grasp, certain of success}}. This is an amazing book: Buy it.
}}
</div>

{{DEFAULTSORT:Instant new society , the}}
[[Category:Anarchist history]]
[[Category:Literary criticism]]
[[Category:Protest]]
[[Category:Articles]]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 <div style="max-width:500px; margin:auto;">
-<font size="5">'''The instant new society'''</font>
+{{p|382}}<font size="5">'''The instant new society'''</font>
 <font size="4">'''[[Author:Paraic Marren|PARAIC MARREN]]'''</font>
@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
-{{sc|When reading the above three books}}, one can&rsquo;t but feel that the {{w|material|May_1968_events_in_France}} has already been presented with a lot more clarity and a lot less verbiage in {{sc|anarchy}} [[Anarchy 89|89]] and [[Anarchy 90|90]] and the excellent ''Solidarity'' pamphlet number 30. Also, this {{qq|history-before-you-really-know-it&rsquo;s-happened}} kind of book has the effect of consigning to the past a movement that is incomplete and the course of which is still undecided.
+{{sc|When reading the above three books}}, one can&rsquo;t but feel that the {{w|material|May_1968_events_in_France}} has already been presented with a lot more clarity and a lot less verbiage in {{sc|anarchy}} [[Anarchy 89|89]] and [[Anarchy 90|90]] and the excellent ''Solidarity'' pamphlet number 30. Also, this {{qq|history-<wbr>before-<wbr>you-<wbr>really-<wbr>know-<wbr>it&rsquo;s-<wbr>happened}} kind of book has the effect of consigning to the past a movement that is incomplete and the course of which is still undecided.
-{{tab}}''The Student Revolt'' is a collection of interviews with various activists including [[Author:Daniel Cohn-Bendit|Cohn-Bendit]]. And, as such, they are conducted by a not particularly constructive interviewer who bounces from one poiint to the next without attempting to probe the depths of anything.
+{{p|s1}}{{tab}}''The Student Revolt'' is a collection of interviews with various activists including [[Author:Daniel Cohn-Bendit|Cohn-<wbr>Bendit]]. And, as such, they are conducted by a not particularly constructive interviewer who bounces from one point to the next without attempting to probe the depths of anything.
-{{tab}}The superficiality is boring. Often the argument is about words, seldom about ideas. In most of his questions, and consequently, in most of the answers, Bourges fails to distinguish the political situation from the educational situation. Cohn-Bendit&rsquo;s interview with {{w|Jean-Paul Sartre|Jean-Paul_Sartre}} is the best section but it is almost the only readable part of a book that is both confused and confusing. Next:
+{{tab}}The superficiality is boring. Often the argument is about words, seldom about ideas. In most of his questions, and consequently, in {{p|383}}most of the answers, Bourges fails to distinguish the political situation from the educational situation. Cohn-<wbr>Bendit&rsquo;s interview with {{w|Jean-<wbr>Paul Sartre|Jean-Paul_Sartre}} is the best section but it is almost the only readable part of a book that is both confused and confusing. Next:
-{{tab}}''French Revolution 1968''. Done in the style of the journalist writing up the latest phenomenon. It is the sort of book usually described as lucid, vivid, trenchant, brilliant. It is all of these, and as a detailed, impartial account of the events it succeeds. {{w|Seale|Patrick_Seale}} and McConville are among the best journalists around, and and their account is sharp, critical and pointed when dealing with the squirming of the authorities and the somersaults of the {{w|communist party|French_Communist_Party}}. However, they flounder irritatingly when dealing with the extreme left. They exaggerate the {{w|Trotskyist|Trotskyism}} and deprecate the anarchist influence. Daniel Cohn-Bendit appears as a sort of rebellious clown who played little more than an amusingly disruptive role and the book holds such gems of unexpurgated blah as {{qq|There could be no greater contrast between the disciplined, purposeful {{l|J.C.R.|https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeunesse_communiste_révolutionnaire}} (Trotskyist) cadres and the free-booting Cohn-Bendit}} and a quoted description of Cohn-Bendit as {{qq|''inorganise et inorganisable''}} (disorgnised and beyond organisation). Yet, it is a fair and readable effort. The dictionary has a word for it: Competent.
+{{p|s2}}{{tab}}''French Revolution 1968''. Done in the style of the journalist writing up the latest phenomenon. It is the sort of book usually described as lucid, vivid, trenchant, brilliant. It is all of these, and as a detailed, impartial account of the events it succeeds. {{w|Seale|Patrick_Seale}} and McConville are among the best journalists around, and and their account is sharp, critical and pointed when dealing with the squirming of the authorities and the somersaults of the {{w|communist party|French_Communist_Party}}. However, they flounder irritatingly when dealing with the extreme left. They exaggerate the {{w|Trotskyist|Trotskyism}} and deprecate the anarchist influence. Daniel Cohn-<wbr>Bendit appears as a sort of rebellious clown who played little more than an amusingly disruptive role and the book holds such gems of unexpurgated blah as {{qq|There could be no greater contrast between the disciplined, purposeful {{l|J.C.R.|https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeunesse_communiste_révolutionnaire}} (Trotskyist) cadres and the free-<wbr>booting Cohn-<wbr>Bendit}} and a quoted description of Cohn-<wbr>Bendit as {{qq|''inorganise et inorganisable''}} (disorgnised and beyond organisation). Yet, it is a fair and readable effort. The dictionary has a word for it: Competent.
-{{tab}}By far the best book of the three is ''The Beginning of the End''.
+{{p|s3}}{{tab}}By far the best book of the three is ''The Beginning of the End''.
-{{tab}}Poetry and Revolution; they are twins. The fever running through the prose-poetry of Quattrocchi in part one (What Happened) brings the future society and its idea closer than all the Marxist jargon and pseudo-dialectic dogma distilled by every {{w|CP|Communist_party}} and authoritarian socialist hack on earth. Through the pages of near-verse one does not so much read of the events as live them.
+{{tab}}Poetry and Revolution; they are twins. The fever running through the prose-<wbr>poetry of Quattrocchi in part one (What Happened) brings the future society and its idea closer than all the Marxist jargon and pseudo-<wbr>dialectic dogma distilled by every {{w|CP|Communist_party}} and authoritarian socialist hack on earth. Through the pages of near-<wbr>verse one does not so much read of the events as live them.
 {{tab}}Although, like the others, it fails to supplement our knowledge of the events, it is yet invaluable as a rendering (Quattrocchi) and as an analysis (Nairn).
@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 {{tab}}{{w|Tom Nairn|Tom_Nairn}} is the author of the second part (Why It Happened).
-{{tab}}He writes of {{qq|the resurrection of anarchist thought and feeling in May, the host of black flags which sprang up from nowhere alongside the red ones. The anarchist {{q|groupuscules}}, feeble organisationally and small in numbers, were nevertheless far closer than the Marxist sects to the spirit of what was happening.}}
+{{tab}}He writes of {{qq|the resurrection of anarchist thought and feeling in May, the host of black flags which sprang up from nowhere alongside the red ones. The anarchist {{q|groupuscules}}, feeble organisationally and small in numbers, were nevertheless far closer than the Marxist sects to the spirit of what was happening}}.
-{{tab}}These two writers understand that there is only one kind of freedom: total freedom. And that it cannot exist within the framework of somebody&rsquo;s state, not though his name be {{w|Dubcek|Alexander_Dubček}} nor {{w|Johnson|Lyndon_B._Johnson}} nor {{w|Castro|Fidel_Castro}} nor {{w|de Gaulle|Charles_de_Gaulle}}. Again Nairn writes {{qq|All the evidence of May suggests strongly that without a powerful dose of anarchic sentiments and ideas, a revolution of this sort and in these conditions is very unlikely to get far}}.
+{{tab}}These two writers understand that there is only one kind of freedom: total freedom. And that it cannot exist within the framework of some&shy;body&rsquo;s state, not though his name be {{w|Dubcek|Alexander_Dubček}} nor {{w|Johnson|Lyndon_B._Johnson}} nor {{w|Castro|Fidel_Castro}} nor {{w|de Gaulle|Charles_de_Gaulle}}. Again Nairn writes {{qq|All the evidence of May suggests strongly that without a powerful dose of anarchic sentiments and ideas, a revolution of this sort and in these conditions is very unlikely to get far}}.
-{{tab}}The authors conclude: {{qq|The anarchism of 1871 looked backwards to a pre-capitalist past, doomed to defeat; the anarchism of 1968 looks forward to the future society almost within our grasp, certain of success}}. This is an amazing book: Buy it.
+{{tab}}The authors conclude: {{qq|The anarchism of 1871 looked backwards to a pre-<wbr>capitalist past, doomed to defeat; the anarchism of 1968 looks forward to the future society almost within our grasp, certain of success}}. This is an amazing book: Buy it.
 }}
 </div>

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 {{tab}}He writes of {{qq|the resurrection of anarchist thought and feeling in May, the host of black flags which sprang up from nowhere alongside the red ones. The anarchist {{q|groupuscules}}, feeble organisationally and small in numbers, were nevertheless far closer than the Marxist sects to the spirit of what was happening.}}
-{{tab}}These two writers understand that there is only one kind of freedom: total freedom. And that it cannot exist within the framework of somebody&rsquo;s state, not though his name be {{w|Dubcek|Alexander_Dubček}} nor {{w|Johnson|Lyndon_Baines_Johnson}} nor {{w|Castro|Fidel_Castro}} nor {{w|de Gaulle|Charles_de_Gaulle}}. Again Nairn writes {{qq|All the evidence of May suggests strongly that without a powerful dose of anarchic sentiments and ideas, a revolution of this sort and in these conditions is very unlikely to get far}}.
+{{tab}}These two writers understand that there is only one kind of freedom: total freedom. And that it cannot exist within the framework of somebody&rsquo;s state, not though his name be {{w|Dubcek|Alexander_Dubček}} nor {{w|Johnson|Lyndon_B._Johnson}} nor {{w|Castro|Fidel_Castro}} nor {{w|de Gaulle|Charles_de_Gaulle}}. Again Nairn writes {{qq|All the evidence of May suggests strongly that without a powerful dose of anarchic sentiments and ideas, a revolution of this sort and in these conditions is very unlikely to get far}}.
 {{tab}}The authors conclude: {{qq|The anarchism of 1871 looked backwards to a pre-capitalist past, doomed to defeat; the anarchism of 1968 looks forward to the future society almost within our grasp, certain of success}}. This is an amazing book: Buy it.

Anarchy 94/The instant new society - Revision history

imported>Ivanhoe at 22:41, 23 September 2016

69.50.181.155 at 01:12, 13 September 2016

69.50.181.155: Created page with "{{header | title = ANARCHY 94 (Vol 8 No 12) DECEMBER 1968The instant new society | author = Paraic Marren | section = | previous = ../Daniel Gu..."

69.50.181.155: Created page with "{{header | title = ANARCHY 94 (Vol 8 No 12) DECEMBER 1968
The instant new society | author = Paraic Marren | section = | previous = ../Daniel Gu..."